Last updated on: July 29, 2025
Section 94A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was introduced to tackle transactions involving countries or territories identified as ‘Notified Jurisdictions’ that do not share adequate tax information with India, commonly referred to as ‘blacklisted jurisdictions.’ Under this provision, stricter scrutiny and adverse tax implications apply to transactions with entities in such jurisdictions, including the denial of certain tax benefits, higher rates of tax disallowance, and the requirement for Indian taxpayers to furnish additional documentation. The objective of Section 94A is to curb tax evasion, promote transparency, and deter abuse of international tax treaties by ensuring that Indian residents cannot exploit loopholes by transacting with these high-risk jurisdictions. The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) notifies the list of such jurisdictions from time to time. Section 94A thus serves as a key anti-avoidance tool in India’s tax regime.
Section 94A of the India Income Tax Act is a special anti-avoidance rule that has come into play in order to tackle taxpayers who either seek profit shifting or involves unexplained dealings between them and countries that may be termed as tax-related, non-cooperative. The section mainly involves dealing with transactions that are related to individuals found in the nations, or nominal areas that do not provide enough data to the Indian officials and the source and validity of funds cannot be determined.
The first introduction of Section 94A was under the Finance Act 2011, however, its relevance and importance keeps increasing in 2025 and in light of the burgeoning cross-border transactions, online business operation models, and the subsequent and increasing acceptance of cryptocurrencies. It makes it very clear that there is a need to have transparency in financial transactions, and it also offers means to the Indian authorities to address tax evasion associated with offshore jurisdictions.
With the growing phenomenon of globalisation, it was becoming usual that people and firms used to do business with other parties in a tax haven or jurisdiction with strong banking confidentiality. Unless such transaction is not competently scrutinised, it may result in:
Section 94A enables the Indian government to consider some countries as Nonified Jurisdiction in the case they do not collaborate on information exchange on tax. It imposes additional burdens on the Indian taxpayers who transact with individuals in these sites to make their life complete and transparent.
Did You Know!
Cyprus in 2013 became the first country to be notified based on Section 94A only to be removed in the listings after their agreement to share information in accordance with Indian demands.
Section 94A is an effective provision as an Income Tax Department weapon. Major characteristics are:
What is a Notified Jurisdictional area under the Section 94A?
A Notified Jurisdictional Area (NJA) is any country or territory notified by the Central Government where the exchange of tax-related information is hindered or insufficient.
Whenever you as an individual or a business engage in a financial transaction with someone in a Notified Jurisdictional Area you must:
On the off-chance that you do not comply with it, the cost can be disallowed as deduction which increases the taxable profits.
Expert Insight
Tax professionals note that, paying tax on transactions with a non notified country will be less likely to attract intense attention but with the growing use of fintech and digital assets, ensuring all cross border transactions have clean documentation has now become a structural recommendation.
In 2025, is Cyprus a Section 94A notified jurisdiction?
No, since 2025 Cyprus is not on the list. Newer jurisdictions may be seen in the current notice.
Familiar situations in which Section 94A may be relevant are:
In 2024, a digital marketing company in India had been willing to pay a partner affiliate in a country that as of a moment suddenly switched to NJA. They were warned by their accountant to take some additional due diligence and other documentations so that they could not pay this TDS at 30 percent on their payment as compared to 10 percent charged on such payments in other regions. They also added all the details of transactions in their tax income, Section 94A.
Did U Know?
By 2025, as online exchanges in professional services and outsourcing of businesses come into force, due diligence over Section 94A transactions have become more relaxed with automated compliance tools given by the leading accountancy firms.
Pros
Cons
What should a taxpayer do to escape problems with Section 94A?
You could accomplish the following fine by ensuring maintenance of all documents needed and making complete disclosures as well as consulting experts prior to engaging in any transaction with any entity in a notified jurisdiction.
Expert Perspective
In outsourcing to a foreign country or using online business platforms to engage in digital marketing, the chartered accountants advise cross checks through trusted online business portals to eliminate the chance of conducting business with persons in the NJAs without knowing.
Feature | Section 94A Applicable Transaction | Regular International Transaction |
---|---|---|
Jurisdiction Type | Notified Jurisdictional Area | Regular (non-notified) Country |
TDS Rate | Greater of 30 percent or Rx | Standard rate as per Income Tax Act |
The Documentation Requirement | Choking, comprehensive | The Orthodox |
Disclosure in Tax Return | mandatory and specific | Generic |
Expenses Deductibility | It may be disallowed | It is allowed, under certain conditions |
Onus of Proof | On taxpayer | On tax department (generally) |
Did You Know?
A number of Indian banks and online payment gateways auto-flag transactions involving high-risk jurisdictions onto additional compliance studies, as part of requirements under Section 94A, by 2025.
Since online marketplaces that unite products and services of different companies on the global scale are now popular, users have an opportunity to compare their offers and choose trusted partners. These platforms:
Whenever outsourcing labor or buying products overseas, one should bear in mind that the such trusted online marketplaces should be preferred so that the risk of befalling an accidental transaction notification under Section 94A becomes merely negligible.
Would there be exclusion of payment made through online marketplace under Section 94A?
Not necessarily, but by transacting through known and reputed platforms, chances of not complying is reduced because in most cases sellers are pre-screened by the platform and the jurisdiction information is provided beforehand.
Expert Insight
The operators of the marketplace offer compliance dashboards with the risks of vendors against laws, such as Section 94A, thus enabling businesses to keep up to date in real time.
Does Section 94A have any penalty on non-compliance?
Yes, non-compliance can result in rejection of expenditure, interest and a penalty on non-deduction or deduction at a late date of TDS.
Section 94A targets transactions with entire countries labelled non-cooperative, whereas Transfer Pricing rules (Section 92 to 92F) target transactions between related parties, regardless of location. GAAR (General Anti Avoidance Rule) is broader and targets abusive arrangements wherever they occur.
Comparison Aspect | Section 94A | Transfer Pricing | GAAR |
---|---|---|---|
Scope | NJAs and non-compliance | Inter-company cross-border | Any abusive arrangement |
Trigger | Country risk | Related party | Substance over form |
Documentation | Required, Enhanced | Complete, Specific | Factual-based |
Did You Know?
The subsection 94A operates in conjunction to, but separately of, both Transfer Pricing and the GAAR meaning that the strict adherence with one will not instruct the adherence of others.
Other companies were disallowed to claim vital costs in the recent few years, merely because they failed to gather the proper documents when transacting with partners in the states of the list at the time. In the current world, automated compliance checklists have been employed in cross-border payments by most big companies.
First Hand Experience
A Mumbai tech startup in 2023 has indiscreetly paid ordinary TDS on payments to a marketing firm in a listed jurisdiction. On audit, the deduction was denied with a massive tax bill commensurate with it. Now they are using online markets to recruit pre-verified compliant vendors.
What is the risk in action of the procedures of Section 94A in 2025?
The wrong steps can result in additional taxes, disallowance of deductions, professional notices, and a bad record with regard to audit.
Expert Insight
As of 2025, the tax authorities are utilizing AI-powered data analytics software to monitor cross border transactions to identify violations of Section 94A therefore making it even more important to be compliant in the first place.
In simple terms what is Section 94A?
Section 94A is aimed against the transaction with residents in a non-cooperative foreign jurisdiction, and its strict documentation, as well as high tax deduction, is required.
So how do I know whether a country is a Notified Jurisdiction pursuant to Section 94A?
The updated list can be found in gates of the government or in the good financial websites.
Does Section 94A have a place in personal remittance?
It applies primarily to transactions of business or professional nature but it is always good to find out whether payment type is covered with the regulations or not.
But what will transpire in case I fail to deduct the greater TDS?
The deduction can be denied and you will incur extra interests and penalties.
What role do online marketplaces play to support Section 94A compliance?
They pre-screen suppliers, reveal nation details and automatically tracks compliance records allowing them to minimize risk.
To get more specific changes and legal documents, one can have a reference to the official Income Tax Department site www.incometax.gov.in and expert advice.
How could we improve this article?
Written by Prem Anand, a content writer with over 10+ years of experience in the Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance sectors.
Prem Anand is a seasoned content writer with over 10+ years of experience in the Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance sectors. He has a strong command of industry-specific language and compliance regulations. He specializes in writing insightful blog posts, detailed articles, and content that educates and engages the Indian audience.
The content is prepared by thoroughly researching multiple trustworthy sources such as official websites, financial portals, customer reviews, policy documents and IRDAI guidelines. The goal is to bring accurate and reader-friendly insights.
This content is created to help readers make informed decisions. It aims to simplify complex insurance and finance topics so that you can understand your options clearly and take the right steps with confidence. Every article is written keeping transparency, clarity, and trust in mind.
Based on Google's Helpful Content System, this article emphasizes user value, transparency, and accuracy. It incorporates principles of E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness).